Posts Tagged ‘Internet Explorer’

Why Standards Matter

January 31st, 2005 by smp | Comments | Filed in smp

Here is another reason why standards matter.

Sam Palmisano, the CEO of IBM, challenged his entire company to
migrate to Linux for their desktop systems by the end of this year.
Turns out things aren’t going so well.

IBM is running into this one tiny little problem. You may have heard
of it, it’s called Internet Explorer. See, many internal IBM web
applications were written with IE-proprietary code, and darned if that
isn’t just one big, huge migration hurdle right there.

From here.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

MSN Toolbar Suite — Not in this machine

December 13th, 2004 by smp | Comments | Filed in RANTING

The MSN Toolbar Suite is out. But not in this house.

Get it now! Free!

Warning! Your browser does not meet the minimum system requirements. You are recommended to use the MSN Toolbar Suite with Internet Explorer 5.01 or later.

Gee, you need to integrate it with MSIE…NOT! Anyone out there going to build a desktop search app that ties into the ‘Fox?


Ok, in the interests of fairness, here is the unabashed positive MSFT view of the toolbar.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Commentaries on MSIE and CSS/Standards Support

December 2nd, 2004 by smp | Comments | Filed in smp

Tristan Nitot and Eric Meyer comment (Tristan : Eric) on the seeming resistance by Microsoft to move MSIE towards a greater degree of W3C Standards support.

As a hack and slash Web developer, the presence of standards is a necessity for me. I can read the W3C description of the <div> tag and it’s child attributes and be able to implement it on my site.

The interesting that is not mentioned in the this is that MSIE lacks support for a number of HTTP-level standards as well. I know that most designers only worry about the screen results, but us Web performance wanks have to worry about the performance repercussions of a new browser release.

The most stunning example of this is continued resistance in some camps to the use of compression, and the utter lack of support for HTTP pipelining in MSIE.

Resistance to compression is a result of broken compression algorithms in older versions of MSIE. If you are actually still using one of these browsers, or an OS that does not support a new version of MSIE, the Web is mostly broken for you anyway, so compression is just another headache.

HTTP Pipelining is supported in all of the browsers…except MSIE. HTTP Pipelining is the ability to request multiple objects simultaneously across the same TCP connection. As most Web objects are small, the immediate impact to Web performance is astounding.

MSIE 6 is a vast improvement over the previous generations that have come out of Redmond. However, it would be interesting to have Microsoft on the side of Web performance as a major provider of server and client software.

Now, if we could only get the Mozilla.org folks to “liberate” the Netscape Enterprise/SunONE Web server code and bring that dinosaur into the modern age, we would all be a happier lot.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,