<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Browser Wars: Internet Explorer 8.0 Released on Windows Update</title>
	<atom:link href="http://newestindustry.org/2009/04/29/browser-wars-internet-explorer-80-released-on-windows-update/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://newestindustry.org/2009/04/29/browser-wars-internet-explorer-80-released-on-windows-update/</link>
	<description>Evolving the Online Performance Experience</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 00:47:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Pierzchala</title>
		<link>http://newestindustry.org/2009/04/29/browser-wars-internet-explorer-80-released-on-windows-update/#comment-1175</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stephen Pierzchala]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 17:24:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newestindustry.org/?p=2472#comment-1175</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Microsoft claims that there are fewer bugs and irregularities in the handling of standards with Internet Explorer 8. That said, I would recommend running the browsers through the ACID2 (&lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acid2&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acid2&lt;/a&gt;) and ACID3 (&lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acid3&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acid3&lt;/a&gt;) CSS tests.smp]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Microsoft claims that there are fewer bugs and irregularities in the handling of standards with Internet Explorer 8. That said, I would recommend running the browsers through the ACID2 (<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acid2" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acid2</a>) and ACID3 (<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acid3" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acid3</a>) CSS tests.smp</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Pierzchala</title>
		<link>http://newestindustry.org/2009/04/29/browser-wars-internet-explorer-80-released-on-windows-update/#comment-1174</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stephen Pierzchala]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 11:24:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newestindustry.org/?p=2472#comment-1174</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Microsoft claims that there are fewer bugs and irregularities in the handling of standards with Internet Explorer 8. That said, I would recommend running the browsers through the ACID2 (&lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acid2&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acid2&lt;/a&gt;) and ACID3 (&lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acid3&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acid3&lt;/a&gt;) CSS tests.smp]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Microsoft claims that there are fewer bugs and irregularities in the handling of standards with Internet Explorer 8. That said, I would recommend running the browsers through the ACID2 (<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acid2" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acid2</a>) and ACID3 (<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acid3" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acid3</a>) CSS tests.smp</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrea Belvedere</title>
		<link>http://newestindustry.org/2009/04/29/browser-wars-internet-explorer-80-released-on-windows-update/#comment-1173</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrea Belvedere]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 04:14:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newestindustry.org/?p=2472#comment-1173</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Another browser to having to deal with....does this means that now we have one extra css conditional statement ?&lt;!--[if IE 6]&gt;trying to cope with ie6 bugs&lt;![endif]--&gt;&lt;!--[if IE 7]&gt;coping with ie7 oddities.&lt;![endif]--&gt;&lt;!--[if IE 8]&gt;coping with bugs ? Oddities ? Own interpretation of tags ?&lt;![endif]--&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another browser to having to deal with&#8230;.does this means that now we have one extra css conditional statement ?&lt;!&#8211;[if IE 6]&gt;trying to cope with ie6 bugs&lt;![endif]&#8211;&gt;&lt;!&#8211;[if IE 7]&gt;coping with ie7 oddities.&lt;![endif]&#8211;&gt;&lt;!&#8211;[if IE 8]&gt;coping with bugs ? Oddities ? Own interpretation of tags ?&lt;![endif]&#8211;&gt;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

