<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Browser Wars: Internet Explorer 8.0 Released on Windows Update</title>
	<atom:link href="http://newestindustry.org/2009/04/29/browser-wars-internet-explorer-80-released-on-windows-update/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://newestindustry.org/2009/04/29/browser-wars-internet-explorer-80-released-on-windows-update/</link>
	<description>Web Performance, Branding, and Social Media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 01:50:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Pierzchala</title>
		<link>http://newestindustry.org/2009/04/29/browser-wars-internet-explorer-80-released-on-windows-update/comment-page-1/#comment-1292</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Pierzchala</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 17:24:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newestindustry.org/?p=2472#comment-1292</guid>
		<description>Microsoft claims that there are fewer bugs and irregularities in the handling of standards with Internet Explorer 8. That said, I would recommend running the browsers through the ACID2 (&lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acid2&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acid2&lt;/a&gt;) and ACID3 (&lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acid3&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acid3&lt;/a&gt;) CSS tests.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;smp</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Microsoft claims that there are fewer bugs and irregularities in the handling of standards with Internet Explorer 8. That said, I would recommend running the browsers through the ACID2 (<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acid2" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acid2</a>) and ACID3 (<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acid3" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acid3</a>) CSS tests.</p>
<p>smp</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Pierzchala</title>
		<link>http://newestindustry.org/2009/04/29/browser-wars-internet-explorer-80-released-on-windows-update/comment-page-1/#comment-1186</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Pierzchala</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 11:24:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newestindustry.org/?p=2472#comment-1186</guid>
		<description>Microsoft claims that there are fewer bugs and irregularities in the handling of standards with Internet Explorer 8. That said, I would recommend running the browsers through the ACID2 (&lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acid2&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acid2&lt;/a&gt;) and ACID3 (&lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acid3&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acid3&lt;/a&gt;) CSS tests.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;smp</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Microsoft claims that there are fewer bugs and irregularities in the handling of standards with Internet Explorer 8. That said, I would recommend running the browsers through the ACID2 (<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acid2" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acid2</a>) and ACID3 (<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acid3" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acid3</a>) CSS tests.</p>
<p>smp</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrea Belvedere</title>
		<link>http://newestindustry.org/2009/04/29/browser-wars-internet-explorer-80-released-on-windows-update/comment-page-1/#comment-1185</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrea Belvedere</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 04:14:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newestindustry.org/?p=2472#comment-1185</guid>
		<description>Another browser to having to deal with....&lt;br&gt;does this means that now we have one extra css conditional statement ?&lt;br&gt;&lt;!--[if IE 6]&gt;&lt;br&gt;trying to cope with ie6 bugs&lt;br&gt;&lt;![endif]--&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;!--[if IE 7]&gt;&lt;br&gt;coping with ie7 oddities.&lt;br&gt;&lt;![endif]--&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;!--[if IE 8]&gt;&lt;br&gt;coping with bugs ? Oddities ? Own interpretation of tags ?&lt;br&gt;&lt;![endif]--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another browser to having to deal with&#8230;.<br />does this means that now we have one extra css conditional statement ?<br />&lt;!&#8211;[if IE 6]&gt;<br />trying to cope with ie6 bugs<br />&lt;![endif]&#8211;&gt;<br />&lt;!&#8211;[if IE 7]&gt;<br />coping with ie7 oddities.<br />&lt;![endif]&#8211;&gt;<br />&lt;!&#8211;[if IE 8]&gt;<br />coping with bugs ? Oddities ? Own interpretation of tags ?<br />&lt;![endif]&#8211;&gt;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
