Newest Industry

Evolving the Online Performance Experience

Feedster’s Fix: A simple reboot?

with 10 comments

I reported that Feedster’s performance had suddenly improved yesterday. [here]

In the aggregated graph, the classic “runaway CPU/memory leak…OOPS!…REBOOT!” performance pattern appears.

Is anyone at Feedster willing to go on the record about this, just for the education of the group?


Technorati: ,

IceRocket: ,

Advertisement

Written by Stephen

July 20 2005 at 09:44

Posted in Uncategorized

10 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. Even their HTML is broken

    http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http://www.technorati.com/search/www.kbcafe.com

    No tag
    No tag
    Multiple tag
    Multiple tag

    Randy Charles Morin

    July 20 2005 at 11:18

  2. Oops, your editor ate my tags. Retry.

    No <html> tag
    No <head> tag
    Multiple </head> tag
    Multiple <body> tag

    Randy Charles Morin

    July 20 2005 at 11:30

  3. Glad that the fixes we’ve been implementing have been working out, and you can see the empirical improvement.

    As for the broken HTML, thanks for reporting the bug! It was a glitch in our last site rollout, and we’re going to fix it ASAP.

    Dave

    David Sifry

    July 20 2005 at 13:38

  4. I believe that the HTML validity issue is now fixed. Thanks for pointing it out!

    Dave

    David Sifry

    July 20 2005 at 15:39

  5. Randy,

    Thanks very much for the heads up. That was a *very* recent regression (you guys are on the ball!), and thanks to your report has now been fixed.

    http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http://www.technorati.com/search/www.kbcafe.com

    Tantek

    Tantek

    July 20 2005 at 15:48

  6. No html tagNo head tagMultiple /head tagMultiple body tag

    Randy Charles Morin

    July 20 2005 at 11:30

  7. As for the broken HTML, thanks for reporting the bug! It was a glitch in our last site rollout, and we’re going to fix it ASAP.Dave

    David Sifry

    July 20 2005 at 13:38

  8. Dave

    David Sifry

    July 20 2005 at 15:39

  9. Thanks very much for the heads up. That was a *very* recent regression (you guys are on the ball!), and thanks to your report has now been fixed.http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http://www.technorati.com/search/www.kbcafe.comTantek

    Tantek

    July 20 2005 at 15:48


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

Gravatar
WordPress.com Logo

Please log in to WordPress.com to post a comment to your blog.

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 269 other followers