<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Technorati, We hardly knew you&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://newestindustry.org/2005/07/13/technorati-we-hardly-knew-you/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://newestindustry.org/2005/07/13/technorati-we-hardly-knew-you/</link>
	<description>Evolving the Online Performance Experience</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 00:47:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: TechCrunch</title>
		<link>http://newestindustry.org/2005/07/13/technorati-we-hardly-knew-you/#comment-459</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[TechCrunch]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jul 2005 11:19:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crazycanuck.wordpress.com/2005/07/13/technorati-we-hardly-knew-you/#comment-459</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;Web 2.0 This Week (July 10 - 16)&lt;/strong&gt;		The main Web 2.0 news this week focused on Technorati (is it dyin or is it rockin?) and the release of Atom 1.0. Lots of other random and interesting stuff as well, including important chia-pet news.	Weekly Summary:1. Technorati is Dead! Long Liv...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Web 2.0 This Week (July 10 &#8211; 16)</strong>		The main Web 2.0 news this week focused on Technorati (is it dyin or is it rockin?) and the release of Atom 1.0. Lots of other random and interesting stuff as well, including important chia-pet news.	Weekly Summary:1. Technorati is Dead! Long Liv&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TechCrunch</title>
		<link>http://newestindustry.org/2005/07/13/technorati-we-hardly-knew-you/#comment-457</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[TechCrunch]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jul 2005 06:19:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crazycanuck.wordpress.com/2005/07/13/technorati-we-hardly-knew-you/#comment-457</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;Web 2.0 This Week (July 10 - 16)&lt;/strong&gt;	
	The main Web 2.0 news this week focused on Technorati (is it dyin or is it rockin?) and the release of Atom 1.0. Lots of other random and interesting stuff as well, including important chia-pet news.
	Weekly Summary:

1. Technorati is Dead! Long Liv...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Web 2.0 This Week (July 10 &#8211; 16)</strong><br />
	The main Web 2.0 news this week focused on Technorati (is it dyin or is it rockin?) and the release of Atom 1.0. Lots of other random and interesting stuff as well, including important chia-pet news.<br />
	Weekly Summary:</p>
<p>1. Technorati is Dead! Long Liv&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marshall Kirkpatrick</title>
		<link>http://newestindustry.org/2005/07/13/technorati-we-hardly-knew-you/#comment-458</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Marshall Kirkpatrick]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2005 21:17:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crazycanuck.wordpress.com/2005/07/13/technorati-we-hardly-knew-you/#comment-458</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[These searches are so slow that I can&#039;t even show clients Technorati anymore.  It takes forever for the front page to load!  It may as well not exist if that&#039;s the case.  I know Sifry says it will be solved in the next 6 weeks, but hasn&#039;t that been said for some time now?  I sure hope they can pull it off.  They seem like such a nice company.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These searches are so slow that I can&#8217;t even show clients Technorati anymore.  It takes forever for the front page to load!  It may as well not exist if that&#8217;s the case.  I know Sifry says it will be solved in the next 6 weeks, but hasn&#8217;t that been said for some time now?  I sure hope they can pull it off.  They seem like such a nice company.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marshall Kirkpatrick</title>
		<link>http://newestindustry.org/2005/07/13/technorati-we-hardly-knew-you/#comment-456</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Marshall Kirkpatrick]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2005 16:17:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crazycanuck.wordpress.com/2005/07/13/technorati-we-hardly-knew-you/#comment-456</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ve been enjoying Blogdigger lately, and I think Feedster deserves some attention.  It&#039;s the Technorati Tag situation that worries me, though I prefer Tagcentral.net for tag searches.  It looks like Gataga.com is down alltogether, too.    I&#039;m sure lots of people are having a hard time with scalability, but hasn&#039;t Technorati gotten more VC funds than anybody else?  Maybe pubsub will pick up the slack.  Obviously there are lots of options, but it&#039;s a big responsibility.

These searches are so slow that I can&#039;t even show clients Technorati anymore.  It takes forever for the front page to load!  It may as well not exist if that&#039;s the case.  I know Sifry says it will be solved in the next 6 weeks, but hasn&#039;t that been said for some time now?  I sure hope they can pull it off.  They seem like such a nice company.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been enjoying Blogdigger lately, and I think Feedster deserves some attention.  It&#8217;s the Technorati Tag situation that worries me, though I prefer Tagcentral.net for tag searches.  It looks like Gataga.com is down alltogether, too.    I&#8217;m sure lots of people are having a hard time with scalability, but hasn&#8217;t Technorati gotten more VC funds than anybody else?  Maybe pubsub will pick up the slack.  Obviously there are lots of options, but it&#8217;s a big responsibility.</p>
<p>These searches are so slow that I can&#8217;t even show clients Technorati anymore.  It takes forever for the front page to load!  It may as well not exist if that&#8217;s the case.  I know Sifry says it will be solved in the next 6 weeks, but hasn&#8217;t that been said for some time now?  I sure hope they can pull it off.  They seem like such a nice company.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blogspotting</title>
		<link>http://newestindustry.org/2005/07/13/technorati-we-hardly-knew-you/#comment-455</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Blogspotting]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2005 15:39:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crazycanuck.wordpress.com/2005/07/13/technorati-we-hardly-knew-you/#comment-455</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;Technorati traffic jam&lt;/strong&gt;Here&#039;s a graph of the Technorati lag time in processing search queries on &quot;New York.&quot; I just tried it myself. Took 10.6 seconds. The first post, just to sample the serendipity of the blogosphere, features this wonderful shot of Brooklyn...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Technorati traffic jam</strong>Here&#8217;s a graph of the Technorati lag time in processing search queries on &#8220;New York.&#8221; I just tried it myself. Took 10.6 seconds. The first post, just to sample the serendipity of the blogosphere, features this wonderful shot of Brooklyn&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blogspotting</title>
		<link>http://newestindustry.org/2005/07/13/technorati-we-hardly-knew-you/#comment-460</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Blogspotting]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2005 15:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crazycanuck.wordpress.com/2005/07/13/technorati-we-hardly-knew-you/#comment-460</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;Technorati traffic jam&lt;/strong&gt;Here&#039;s a graph of the Technorati lag time in processing search queries on &quot;New York.&quot; I just tried it myself. Took 10.6 seconds. The first post, just to sample the serendipity of the blogosphere, features this wonderful shot of Brooklyn...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Technorati traffic jam</strong>Here&#8217;s a graph of the Technorati lag time in processing search queries on &#8220;New York.&#8221; I just tried it myself. Took 10.6 seconds. The first post, just to sample the serendipity of the blogosphere, features this wonderful shot of Brooklyn&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

