<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Schwimmer Concept: Commercial Aggregation v. Non-commercial Aggregation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://newestindustry.org/2005/01/16/the-schwimmer-concept-commercial-aggregation-v-non-commercial-aggregation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://newestindustry.org/2005/01/16/the-schwimmer-concept-commercial-aggregation-v-non-commercial-aggregation/</link>
	<description>Evolving the Online Performance Experience</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 00:47:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Governor</title>
		<link>http://newestindustry.org/2005/01/16/the-schwimmer-concept-commercial-aggregation-v-non-commercial-aggregation/#comment-69</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[James Governor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jan 2005 18:35:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://crazycanuck.wordpress.com/2005/01/16/the-schwimmer-concept-commercial-aggregation-v-non-commercial-aggregation/#comment-69</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google is the poster child - and it has the deepest pockets. Enjoy those lawsuits Evil Twins. this is potentially somewhat like the SCO case, isn&#039;t it? but google is in no position to indemnify anyone. will we see RIAA style cease and desist letters send to all aggregators? probably. we should probably just ignore them - the judge wont throw us into jail if recent RIAA failures are anything to go by]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google is the poster child &#8211; and it has the deepest pockets. Enjoy those lawsuits Evil Twins. this is potentially somewhat like the SCO case, isn&#8217;t it? but google is in no position to indemnify anyone. will we see RIAA style cease and desist letters send to all aggregators? probably. we should probably just ignore them &#8211; the judge wont throw us into jail if recent RIAA failures are anything to go by</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Governor</title>
		<link>http://newestindustry.org/2005/01/16/the-schwimmer-concept-commercial-aggregation-v-non-commercial-aggregation/#comment-68</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[James Governor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jan 2005 13:35:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://crazycanuck.wordpress.com/2005/01/16/the-schwimmer-concept-commercial-aggregation-v-non-commercial-aggregation/#comment-68</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google is the poster child - and it has the deepest pockets. Enjoy those lawsuits Evil Twins. this is potentially somewhat like the SCO case, isn&#039;t it? but google is in no position to indemnify anyone. will we see RIAA style cease and desist letters send to all aggregators? probably. we should probably just ignore them - the judge wont throw us into jail if recent RIAA failures are anything to go by]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google is the poster child &#8211; and it has the deepest pockets. Enjoy those lawsuits Evil Twins. this is potentially somewhat like the SCO case, isn&#8217;t it? but google is in no position to indemnify anyone. will we see RIAA style cease and desist letters send to all aggregators? probably. we should probably just ignore them &#8211; the judge wont throw us into jail if recent RIAA failures are anything to go by</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

