<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Long Tail Phenomenom</title>
	<atom:link href="http://newestindustry.org/2004/12/22/the-long-tail-phenomenom/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://newestindustry.org/2004/12/22/the-long-tail-phenomenom/</link>
	<description>Evolving the Online Performance Experience</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 May 2012 18:45:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Desirable Roasted Coffee</title>
		<link>http://newestindustry.org/2004/12/22/the-long-tail-phenomenom/#comment-46</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Desirable Roasted Coffee]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Dec 2004 22:20:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://crazycanuck.wordpress.com/2004/12/22/the-long-tail-phenomenom/#comment-46</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;Long Tail (updated)&lt;/strong&gt;Update (December 22, 2005): Stephen Pierzchala, who writes the Lost Below the 49th blog argues that Anderson&#039;s thinking is hardly original.:    &quot;The whole reason that the Internet retail channel was touted in the first place was for just the reas...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Long Tail (updated)</strong>Update (December 22, 2005): Stephen Pierzchala, who writes the Lost Below the 49th blog argues that Anderson&#8217;s thinking is hardly original.:    &#8220;The whole reason that the Internet retail channel was touted in the first place was for just the reas&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Allan Jenkins</title>
		<link>http://newestindustry.org/2004/12/22/the-long-tail-phenomenom/#comment-45</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Allan Jenkins]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Dec 2004 22:05:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://crazycanuck.wordpress.com/2004/12/22/the-long-tail-phenomenom/#comment-45</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s not new, and you&#039;ll note that Virginia mentioned that she had covered the concept in Forbes ASAP in 1999. Kevin Kelly&#039;s New Rules for the New Economy (1998) touched it, as did Frances Cairncross in the Death of Distance (&#039;96, if memory serves).What&#039;s not new but relevant about Anderson&#039;s article isa) it&#039;s coming after the dot-bust. Rightly or wrongly, much of the &quot;net punditry&quot; slate was wiped clean in 2000-2001. A lot of relevant stuff written them was tossed in the trash heap with all the worthless stock options.b) In 1998-2000, little history could guide us. We only knew how going digital &quot;should&quot; affect intellectual property. Now we know a lot more, and Anderson did a pretty good job of pulling that together. It&#039;s not original, but it&#039;s important because many more managers are ready to think about the message.c) Yeah, he &quot;invented&quot; a term for it. A pithy one that people are latching onto. As a communicator, I can say that is only good. Again... not original, but right place and right time.All the best, Allan]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s not new, and you&#8217;ll note that Virginia mentioned that she had covered the concept in Forbes ASAP in 1999. Kevin Kelly&#8217;s New Rules for the New Economy (1998) touched it, as did Frances Cairncross in the Death of Distance (&#8217;96, if memory serves).What&#8217;s not new but relevant about Anderson&#8217;s article isa) it&#8217;s coming after the dot-bust. Rightly or wrongly, much of the &#8220;net punditry&#8221; slate was wiped clean in 2000-2001. A lot of relevant stuff written them was tossed in the trash heap with all the worthless stock options.b) In 1998-2000, little history could guide us. We only knew how going digital &#8220;should&#8221; affect intellectual property. Now we know a lot more, and Anderson did a pretty good job of pulling that together. It&#8217;s not original, but it&#8217;s important because many more managers are ready to think about the message.c) Yeah, he &#8220;invented&#8221; a term for it. A pithy one that people are latching onto. As a communicator, I can say that is only good. Again&#8230; not original, but right place and right time.All the best, Allan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Desirable Roasted Coffee</title>
		<link>http://newestindustry.org/2004/12/22/the-long-tail-phenomenom/#comment-44</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Desirable Roasted Coffee]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Dec 2004 17:20:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://crazycanuck.wordpress.com/2004/12/22/the-long-tail-phenomenom/#comment-44</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;Long Tail (updated)&lt;/strong&gt;Update (December 22, 2005): Stephen Pierzchala, who writes the Lost Below the 49th blog argues that Anderson&#039;s thinking is hardly original.:



    &quot;The whole reason that the Internet retail channel was touted in the first place was for just the reas...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Long Tail (updated)</strong>Update (December 22, 2005): Stephen Pierzchala, who writes the Lost Below the 49th blog argues that Anderson&#8217;s thinking is hardly original.:</p>
<p>    &#8220;The whole reason that the Internet retail channel was touted in the first place was for just the reas&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Allan Jenkins</title>
		<link>http://newestindustry.org/2004/12/22/the-long-tail-phenomenom/#comment-43</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Allan Jenkins]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Dec 2004 17:05:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://crazycanuck.wordpress.com/2004/12/22/the-long-tail-phenomenom/#comment-43</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s not new, and you&#039;ll note that Virginia mentioned that she had covered the concept in Forbes ASAP in 1999. Kevin Kelly&#039;s New Rules for the New Economy (1998) touched it, as did Frances Cairncross in the Death of Distance (&#039;96, if memory serves).



What&#039;s not new but relevant about Anderson&#039;s article is



a) it&#039;s coming after the dot-bust. Rightly or wrongly, much of the &quot;net punditry&quot; slate was wiped clean in 2000-2001. A lot of relevant stuff written them was tossed in the trash heap with all the worthless stock options.



b) In 1998-2000, little history could guide us. We only knew how going digital &quot;should&quot; affect intellectual property. Now we know a lot more, and Anderson did a pretty good job of pulling that together. It&#039;s not original, but it&#039;s important because many more managers are ready to think about the message.



c) Yeah, he &quot;invented&quot; a term for it. A pithy one that people are latching onto. As a communicator, I can say that is only good. Again... not original, but right place and right time.



All the best, Allan]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s not new, and you&#8217;ll note that Virginia mentioned that she had covered the concept in Forbes ASAP in 1999. Kevin Kelly&#8217;s New Rules for the New Economy (1998) touched it, as did Frances Cairncross in the Death of Distance (&#8217;96, if memory serves).</p>
<p>What&#8217;s not new but relevant about Anderson&#8217;s article is</p>
<p>a) it&#8217;s coming after the dot-bust. Rightly or wrongly, much of the &#8220;net punditry&#8221; slate was wiped clean in 2000-2001. A lot of relevant stuff written them was tossed in the trash heap with all the worthless stock options.</p>
<p>b) In 1998-2000, little history could guide us. We only knew how going digital &#8220;should&#8221; affect intellectual property. Now we know a lot more, and Anderson did a pretty good job of pulling that together. It&#8217;s not original, but it&#8217;s important because many more managers are ready to think about the message.</p>
<p>c) Yeah, he &#8220;invented&#8221; a term for it. A pithy one that people are latching onto. As a communicator, I can say that is only good. Again&#8230; not original, but right place and right time.</p>
<p>All the best, Allan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

